Â鶹´«Ã½

It’s no secret that people are fascinated by health sciences research. They recognize the impact that research results can have on their lives and are curious about the latest findings. But communicating about research findings isn’t a simple task. Scientific results often represent a small piece of a larger, often complicated puzzle that many research teams are trying to piece together. This process can come across to the public as messy and unclear. Worse, because research findings can sometimes appear contradictory, they may seem untrustworthy.

We first launched this section on the NIH website in 2016. At the time, two fairly recent communications challenges—the Ebola outbreak followed by the Zika outbreak—prompted the NIH communications team to think about building a platform to discuss how to communicate responsibly about biomedical research. We created Science, Health, and Public Trust to start a conversation among science communicators about how to convey complex research results to the public in ways that are clear, credible, accurate, and accessible.

We asked NIH’s network of Public Information Officers (PIOs) about topics they would find helpful. PIOs ar Â鶹´«Ã½-funded institutions around the globe play a key role in communicating health and science news to the public. We started working to produce posts discussing some of the concerns.

As the project evolved, two categories of posts emerged: perspectives and tools. We recently redesigned and relaunched the website to reflect these two categories.

The Perspectives section offers insights on biomedical communication from NIH experts representing different scientific fields. Examples include:

• Infectious disease expert Dr. Anthony S. Fauci, director of NIH's National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, discussed how to communicate about crises like the Ebola and Zika outbreaks.
• Drug addiction expert Dr. Nora D. Volkow, director of NIH's National Institute on Drug Abuse, described how to report on the science behind addiction.
• Dr. Jon R. Lorsch, director of NIH’s National Institute of General Medical Sciences, wrote about responsible communication about basic research studies.
• Epidemiology and biostatistics expert Dr. Mike Lauer, deputy director for NIH Extramural Research, wrote about putting studies that use biomarkers and surrogate endpoints into perspective.
• Dr. Eliseo J. Pérez-Stable, director of NIH’s National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, discussed the importance of considering race and ethnicity in research.

The Tools section provides useful aids like these:

• Checklist for communicating science and health research to the public
• One-page guide to understanding the different kinds of clinical studies Ìý
• Infographic about communicating health risks

We also have a new Resources section that links to other helpful sites both ar Â鶹´«Ã½ and beyond.

We’ll continue to explore important issues in communicating scientific research and develop new tools to help support health and science communications for the public. We invite you to look around the redesigned site, , and join the conversation by emailing us your thoughts and suggestions.